contact          search         

Home

Logo of Council of Europe

We are happy to announce that the EVOTE2012, the fifth international conference on electronic voting, will be held once again under the auspices of the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Mr Thorbjorn Jagland.

We thank the Council of Europe for its continuous support to make the EVOTE an extraordinary meeting place for the e-voting. community.

Save the date for the EVOTE2012: 11-14 July 2012 at Schloss Hofen, Austria. Papers can be submitted until 17 February 2012.



Schloss-Hofen-Seite

We have received numerous requests from authors to extend the submission date for papers for the EVOTE2012 conference.

We are therefore extending the deadline to submit papers by two weeks.
We look forward to receive your paper by no later than Friday, February 17, 2012 (11:59pm).
Please make sure that you submit your paper(s) by this new deadline.

The EVOTE2012 is the fifth international conference on electronic voting and brings together a unique international and interdisciplinary mix of academia, administration, government and industry to discuss the latest trends and developments in e-voting.

The EVOTE2012 conference is taking place under the theme "Challenges for Electronic Voting - Transparency, Trust and Voter Education". The conference takes place at Schloss Hofen in Austria 11-14 July 2012.

To submit your paper please use the template as well as the guidelines and us the submission system available at http://www.easychair.org/conference/?conf=evote2012

Only submissions in Word and PDF format submitted via easychair are accepted.

We look forward to your submission and if you need any further information about the conference, go to http://www.e-voting.cc/2012

Best regards,

E-Voting.CC Team



NL_05_2011

The fifth and final edition of the Modern Democracy News for 2011 is now available for download!

With this edition you receive once again an insight of the latest news, trends and developments in the world of e-voting.

The newsletter is a PDF document available for download (LINK)

The current edition covers the following topics:
- EVOTE2012: How to submit your paper!
- New Working Paper of E-Voting.CC regarding i-voting for shareholder meetings
- Updated of the world map of e-voting
- Electronic voting plans of Belgium
- E-voting in parliaments
- E-voting in the United Kingdom
- Shortnews & Upcoming Events

We wish all subscribers of the Modern Democracy News Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! We hope you continue reading our news in 2012!

We are very much looking forward to your feedback and hope you enjoy reading this issue of our Newsletter.
You can always reach us at office@e-voting.cc



On October 27th, 2011, the first public test with the new electronic voting machines has been executed in Belgium and 6.700 votes have been cast. The machines will be used in the municipal election in 2012 for the first time. The use will not be nationwide but only in selected municipalities.

The current status is that two municipalities in the Region of Brussels as well as half of the municipalities in the region Flanders will use the new EVM.

The new machines have been developed by a consortium led by Smartmatic. The modernized electoral process will be a combination of a touch-based Electronic Voting machine, a barcode printer, a scanner and a ballot box. This multi-faceted and complicated looking system design and setup is the result of the research efforts from the project “bevote”.

The voting machine hardware is based on previous developed voting machines from Smartmatic with an increased screen size and resolution and a newly developed operating system for the machines. The requirement engineering has been subject of the tendering process which originally planned a development time of two months. This timeframe is not sufficient when you take a look at the detailed requirements and specifications. Such requirements made a new development of the operating system of the EVM mandatory, which is an important factor for the successful implementation of electronic voting systems in general due to the very specific needs and demands of different political and electoral systems.

IMG-20111108-00039

The setup consists in detail of the electronic voting machine. This machine does not store the vote or any voter information. The voting process at the machine is initiated by the voter with an identification card, which has been given to the voter by the polling station representatives based on a voter’s identity and eligibility check. Per polling station there will be 50 cards existing.

The casting of the votes takes place on the screen of the machine and the voter is displayed only the races he or she is eligible to participate.

After making the choices and confirming the selection the ballot paper is printed by the voting machine on a paper stripe containing the vote as a two-dimensional barcode and the selection per election in clear letters.

IMG-20111108-00041

The voter takes the printed ballot to the separately located ballot box with a barcode scanning unit on top and puts the ballot after the successful scan in the sealed ballot box.

IMG-20111108-00042

The scanning unit is connected to a laptop, which automatically stores the cast vote on two redundant secure USB-sticks. The used laptop does contain any other software than the electoral administration tool used for administrating the voting cards and for operating the USB-Sticks. As operating system for the laptops a Linux distribution is used.

IMG-20111108-00044

The whole system worked in the artificial test environment perfectly and although the process sounds very complex and complicated, it was relatively easy to be executed. According to the representatives from the national electoral office in Belgium and the developer of the solution this impression was confirmed by the test users in the trials at the end of October. The final test for the solution will be the certification and auditing executed by the PWC later in December.


Acknowledgements:
We would like to thank the Belgium federal election authorities, the election administrators of the region Brussels as well as the developer Smartmatic for their cooperation and openness as well as access to the machines.



flag_UK


Guest article by Charles Lasham, Independent Election Consultant


Electoral Pilot Schemes 2000-2007

Since 2000, the Electoral Commission for the United Kingdom (www.electoralcommission.org.uk)
encouraged local authorities in England to undertake pilot schemes that test new methods of voting and voting arrangements at local government elections which, if successful, might be adopted more widely. Between 2000 and 2007 there were six separate rounds of electoral pilot schemes. Pilots have included advance voting, all-postal voting pilots, multi-channel electronic voting and e-counting.

Electronic voting

The May 2007 elections saw five local authorities pilot a range of e-voting solutions, including remote internet voting, telephone voting and the provision of electronic polling stations enabling a ‘vote anywhere’ environment on polling day. In broad terms, the remote e-voting elements of the May 2007 pilot schemes proved successful and facilitated voting, although there were some issues concerning accessibility, public understanding of the pre-registration process and, in at least one pilot area, technical problems in relation to telephone voting. However, in common with the e-counting pilots, there was insufficient time available to implement and plan the pilots, and the quality assurance and testing was undertaken too late and lacked sufficient depth.

The Commission recommended that no further e-voting is undertaken until the following four elements are in place:

• There must be a comprehensive electoral modernization strategy outlining how transparency, public trust and cost effectiveness can be achieved.

• A central process must be implemented to ensure that sufficiently secure and transparent e-voting solutions that have been tested and approved can be selected by local authorities.

• Sufficient time must be allocated for planning e-voting pilots.

• Individual voter registration must be implemented.

And the Commission concluded that it “cannot support any further e-voting in the absence of a framework incorporating these recommendations. “

Electronic counting

The issues surrounding e-counting at the May 2007 elections were considered to be complex and far-reaching. The elections saw six local authorities pilot e-counting, with mixed outcomes. While e-counting was successfully implemented in three authorities, the failure of the e-counting solutions in the three other local authorities resulted in the counts taking significantly longer than a normal manual count would have done.

The Commission believes that the piloting process has largely achieved its objective for e-counting and the Commission concluded that:

• Substantial testing must be undertaken;

• Sufficient time must be allowed for the development of e-counting projects;

• Measures must be in place to ensure that current best practice is adopted.

One area where e-counting has been tried and tested successfully in the UK is in Greater London. The Greater London Returning Officer and the Office of London Elects (www.londonelects.org.uk) have taken unprecedented steps to ensure visibility, transparency and accuracy in the use of electronic vote counting technology since 1999. There will be three different voting systems in place for the three elections to be held in London on 3rd May, 2012. These are the biggest single set of elections in the United Kingdom with the election of the Mayor of London and 25 Assembly members. There will be over 5 million electors, using 4000 polling stations and there are 4 votes for each elector with three different electoral systems and three different coloured ballot papers.



flag_UK

In 2002, Westminster tried to reform the House of Lords. There were five options; they took five majority votes and lost the lot. In other words, for the given voters’ profile, they used a decision-making procedure by which a decision could not be made. Robin Cook MP then tried to introduce preference voting but in vain, because “that would have involved the technological development of a pencil and a piece of paper… too [much] for our parliament and its medieval procedures.” So, is there a chance for electronic voting in the Parliament of the UK?

Majority voting in parliaments

The term electronic voting usually refers to the electorate, rarely if ever to parliaments. And as shown in the book Defining Democracy (Springer, 2011), politicians like majority voting. It allows them to control almost the entire ‘democratic’ process: they write the question, and the question is (usually) the answer. In any plural democracy, however, there should invariably be more than two possible solutions to any controversy. A better solution would be debating all options by MPs and then vote electronically and in secret.

According to the author, Majority voting is inaccurate and highly adversarial. A more inclusive and democratic methodology is the Modified Borda Count (MBC), as demonstrated in an electronic vote in Belfast in 1991, three years before the IRA cease-fire, and many times since.



Guest Article by Peter Emerson
The de Borda Institute
www.deborda.org



Cover_WP_i-voting

This new E-Voting.CC Working Paper analyses the challenges of implementing internet voting and provides a comprehensive
set of solutions. The paper introduces an up-to-date, holistic model of contemporary challenges associated with remote e-voting (internet voting) and uses it to discuss workable and clear-cut solutions for each of the internet voting constraints. It offers a complete guide along an array of specific tactical measures to be taken to cope with or prevent the majority of known problems with remote e-voting. Most importantly, the paper presents a set of important strategic recommendations which embrace the best practices and expert knowledge in the field and can pave the road to success in implementing remote electronic voting in legally binding political elections.

Download this Working Paper @ WP_1-2011_Challenges_i-voting (pdf, 153 KB)


HOME

TEAM

NEWS

SERVICES

REFERENCES

RESOURCES

CONFERENCE

SEMINARS

DATABASE


subscribe to the
E-Voting.CC
community
newsletter:


Pep-Logo